Acts 28:28
Be it known therefore unto you,
that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles,
and that they will hear it.
Jerry wrote:
You are in complete error on the "two gospels" theory. Phillip preached the same message to the Gentiles as was delivered to the Jews in Jerusalem. Acts 8:5: Then Philip went down to the city of Samaria, and preached Christ unto them. Acts 8:6: And the people with one accord gave heed unto those things which Philip spake, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did. Acts 8:12: But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.
Peter delivered the same message to Cornelius and his household as he delivered to the Jews at Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost. Acts 10:28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company or come unto one of another nation, but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. Acts 10:34 Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: Acts 10:35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him. Acts 10:36 The word which [God] sent unto the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (he is Lord of all:) Acts 10:37 That word, [I say], ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached; Acts 10:38 How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him.
Acts 10:44: While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. Acts 10:45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Acts 10:46: For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
Acts 10:47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? Acts 10:48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.
Paul preached the same gospel to the Gentiles as Peter had preached to Cornelius (an Italian) and the Jews in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost.
Acts 19:1: And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples, Acts 19:2; He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost. Acts 19:3 And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism. Acts 19:4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.
Acts 19:5: When they heard [this], they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Acts 19:6: And when Paul had laid [his] hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
This is the only plan of Salvation that has been in force since the day of Pentecost. It is for whoever will, and that means you and me, as well as the Jews. Same plan, the same way, the plan is Acts 2:38: Then Peter said unto them, Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Acts 2:39: For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, [even] as many as the Lord our God shall call.
Dear Jerry,
It sounds like you are telling us, not asking us a question, and with much of what you say, we agree and believe. Jesus Christ has always been The Way of Salvation, and that never changes under any dispensation. In That Light, there is but One Gospel, for they knew Him and believed on Him as Jehovah in the Old Testament, for He is The Only True God.
What you are failing to see from His Word is The Dispensation we currently enjoy and its Gospel, even after sending you so much Scriptural proof. Certainly, you must see that God was reaching out to Israel first during the time of the Book of Acts, and when they refused to believe, He began using the Gentiles to provoke them into jealousy (Rom. 11:11-14). They still did not heed God's warning, so since Acts 28:28, salvation is no longer of the Jews but is sent to the Gentiles so "whosoever" can believe. The reality is Israel is blind, and the only nation we know of that totally rejects Jesus Christ, for all others see Him as at least a good man, but to them, He is a false prophet and false Messiah. Blindness had happened to Israel in PART according to Romans 11:25, but now and for the two days of Hosea (2000 years), Israel is Lo-Ammi according to Scripture. Let's look at Acts 28:28 closely with honest attention to the detail God gives us.
ACTS 28. The Dispensational Boundary
The structure of Acts 28 and the commentary on this section are intended to prove that Acts 28 is indeed of the utmost dispensational importance to the believer today. It marks a frontier.
Acts 28:23-31 The Dispensational Landmark
A a Acts 28:23. Chief of the Jews come to Paul's lodging.b Acts 28:23. Paul "expounded" the Kingdom of God.c Acts 28:23. Persuading concerning Jesus.d Acts 28:23. Out of the law and prophets.e Acts 28:23. From morning till evening.B f Acts 28:24-25. They agreed not among themselves.g Acts 28:25. They departed.C h Acts 28:25. The word of the Holy Ghost.i Acts 28:26. Go unto this people.j Acts 28:26. Hear . . . not understand.
D Acts 28:27. Hearts waxed gross. Ears dull. Eyes closed. Eyes see. Ears hear.
-
Isa. 6:10. Hearts understand.
Be converted.
I should heal them.
-
- C h Acts 28:28. The salvation of God.
i Acts 28:28. SENT unto the Gentiles. j Acts 28:28. They will hear it.
- B g Acts 28:29. The Jews departed.
- f Acts 28:29. Great reasoning among themselves.A a Acts 28:30. All come to Paul's hired house.b Acts 28:31. Paul "preaches" the kingdom of God.c Acts 28:31. "Teaches" concerning the Lord Jesus Christ.d Acts 28:31. With all confidence. No reference to O.T.e Acts 28:31. Unhindered.
The Dispensational Boundary
The ministry of Paul to the Elders of Israel in Rome, as recorded in Acts 28, is an echo of the ministry of the Lord during His forty days on earth, as recorded in Acts 1.
-
Speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God (Acts 1:3).
He expounded and testified the kingdom of God (Acts 28:23).
The record given in Acts 1:3 is a summary of what is written at large in Luke 24, where "Moses and the Prophets" are "expounded" by the Lord "concerning Himself." In Acts 28, Paul persuaded the Jews "concerning Jesus" both out of the law of "Moses" and out of the "Prophets." The parallel is intentional.
The THEME in both is "concerning Himself"; and "concerning Jesus."
The THEME includes the "hope" of Israel. "We trusted" (Luke 24:21) translates elpizo "we hoped". The "hope" of Israel (Acts 28:20) translates elpis.
The BASIS of this ministry in both passages is the O.T. Scriptures, Luke 24:25, Luke 24:27, Luke 24:45, and Acts 28:23.
The METHOD is Exposition, Luke 24:27, Luke 24:32, Acts 28:23.
The OBJECT is Persuasion, Luke 24:25, Luke 24:32, Luke 24:45, Acts 28:26.
In addition, we have such parallels as the use of the word bradus "slow" (Luke 24:25) and "dull" bareos (Acts 28:27). While the eyes of the two in Luke 24 were "opened," the eyes of Israel were "closed" (Acts 28:27).
In neither Luke 24, Acts 1, nor Acts 28 have we yet discovered the slightest allusion to the high calling of The Church of The Mystery. We are on the verge of its revelation, but not until Israel became Lo-ammi "not My people" could that calling of the Gentiles that goes back to its inception to "before the foundation of the world" be made known.
The testimony of the Apostle on that memorable day was twofold. It concerned "the kingdom of God" and "concerning Jesus," and it was found entirely in the testimony of the Old Testament. There is a great difference between "the kingdom of God," "the kingdom of Heaven," and "The Church which is His Body".
It is evident that "the restoration of the kingdom to Israel" (Acts 1:6). arose as a direct result of the Lord's testimony "pertaining to the kingdom of God" (Acts 1:3), and Paul, in Acts 26:22, declared that up to that point, he had declared "none other than Moses and the Prophets did say should come." So, here, in his testimony to the Elders of the Jews, the teaching of the O.T. Scriptures that impinged on "the hope of Israel" set the limits to his message. When one remembers the scrupulous care with which the Apostle speaks of his Lord in his Epistles, rarely calling Him "Jesus" but nearly always giving Him His title "Lord" or "Jesus (the) Christ," it is a matter of importance to observe that to the Jews he spoke "concerning Jesus."
When the dismissal of the Jew was over, and the Salvation of God was sent to the Gentile, a change was observed. He now speaks "concerning the Lord Jesus Christ" (Acts 28:31). Not only so, the omission of any reference to the O.T. scriptures is eloquent.
In his early Epistles, Paul makes a constant appeal to the Old Testament. The Gospel which he preached had been "promised afore in the holy scriptures" (Rom. 1:2); the doctrine of Justification by Faith is confirmed by the words "as it is written" (Rom. 1:17); indeed "What saith the Scriptures?" (Rom. 4:3) might well be cited as typical of Paul's attitude during his early ministry. In 2 Timothy 3:16, Paul makes it clear that to the very end, he unhesitatingly believed that "All scripture was given by inspiration of God" - and yet the moment we cross the boundary line of Acts 28 into his "Prison Epistles" that moment we come into the light of a new revelation, something that had been hid in God from the ages, and something not found in the O.T. writings, something indeed that was a Mystery, or a Secret as the word means. "It is written" occurs some forty times in Paul's early Epistles. The phrase is never again employed by him after Acts 28. Not one quotation of Scripture meets us in Ephesians 1 until we come to the reference to Psalm 8 in Ephesians 1:21-23.
We read on through Chapters 2 and 3 right into the practical section, Chapter 4, before we meet the next reference to the O.T., namely Ephesians 4:8. There is no direct quotation of O.T. Scripture in Philippians or Colossians and but one in 2 Timothy 2:9, an allusion to Numbers 16:5 and Num. 16:26.
In the seven later Epistles, there are not more than eight references to the O.T., and of this number, not one can be said to teach the peculiar doctrine that was entrusted to Paul to make known. We have already reminded the reader that the word "depart" apoluo (Acts 28:25) indicates Israel's "divorcement," and the words "they agreed not" (assumphonos) are used of the marriage relationship also (1 Cor. 7:5).
The failure of Israel and the consequent blessing of the Gentile was foreshadowed in Paul's opening ministry, as recorded in Acts 13. The doom there threatened now falls. Here is the de facto execution of the sentence that was pronounced de jure in Matthew 23:38, "Your house is left unto you desolate." Since the call of Abraham, the Scriptures contain no record of a Gentile being saved independently of Israel. "Salvation is of the Jews" was the testimony of the Lord Himself to the woman of Samaria.
Acts 28 ends with the Apostle dwelling for two years in his own hired house, preaching and teaching "no man forbidding him". During Paul's early ministry, the Jew had consistently opposed the preaching of The Gospel to the Gentiles, and this, said the Apostle, was their climax sin.
They "killed the Lord Jesus," but forgiveness was given, and a new opportunity to believe and repent was granted. They had earlier "killed their own prophets" and had more recently "persecuted" the Apostle and his helpers, "forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved," reaching, however, a climax "To Fill Up their sins always for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost" (1 Thess. 2:15-16).
"To the bitter end," reads Moffatt. "In its severest form," reads Weymouth. This same word, "forbidding," found in 1 Thessalonians 2:16, is the word used by Paul, "No man forbidding him" - Israel, the opposer, had gone. They had filled up their measure of sin to the brim, and the very Gentiles that they had "forbidden" now entered into blessings hitherto unrevealed.
All God's Blessings,
The Believers
Hosea 1:9
Then said God, Call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God.
Quote: We believe that since the setting aside of Israel (Acts 28)
Greetings in the Name of our Sovereign Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Yeshua, Risen Lord and King of Kings! Praise God in the Highest and Revere His Holy Name!
May I correct you, dear fellow students of the Great and Glorious Word? God has not 'set aside' Israel, and neither has anyone who believes in the fullness of the promises of His Blessed Scriptures. Lest we forget, God introduced the nature of Himself (which was His Jewishness) to the world in the Son of the Living God, Jesus Christ (Yeshua) that; all who believed in Him shall be saved; not some you should note but all; including His apple, His chosen; Israel.
In the final acts of the closing phases of this present age (which will occur in the coming soon period, though no man can know the exact day or hour), it is that which God Almighty shall decide on Israel and the many fulfilments of prophecy concerning Israel that will determine the final course of man's last days on this Earth but it shall not involve a 'setting aside' of Israel at any count.
Were dear Israel 'set aside', then none of your future would happen. Both Jew and true Body of Christ Christian will unite to protect that which we not only share but also that which we honor. Those who do not will depart from the Body and shall not share in the promise.
Your 'set aside' Israel, embraced and protected within and by the Body, will be the only answer for a world taken up by madness the like of which no man has ever seen or known and which is already descended.
Prepare the Way of the Lord and include Israel, and do not set her aside. Our Lord and Almighty One will not, and neither should we.
In Christ Eternal. Maranatha!
Peter
Dear Peter,
God Bless you, and thank you for writing.
We regret that you may have misunderstood the teaching, for Israel is truly set aside until God chooses to lift the divorcement, which He will shortly do. They have been blind and scattered for the 2 days of Hosea (two thousand years), but He will remember them and accomplish all that He promised in spite of their unbelief. We offer this short explanation:
Lo-ammi "Not My people." It is demonstrated from Scripture that Israel alone, with one exceptional case, is called "People"; the nations of the earth are never so-called except in the plural - "peoples." To one nation only has the title "My People" ever been given, and that is Israel. The exception is found in Titus 2:14, where The Church is spoken of as a peculiar people, but that title is used while Israel themselves are "lo-ammi," not My people. At the time of Acts, twenty-eight Israel passes off the scene, and the parenthetical Dispensation of The Mystery begins. See "The Acts 28 Crisis".
With this great Dispensational feature indicated by the words lo-ammi, we approach under the following headings:
- The testimony of Acts thirteen to the lo-ammi period that was approaching.
- The O.T. illustration provided in the Book of Judges.
- The prophecy of Hosea, where the name lo-ammi occurs.
Acts thirteen records the opening of Paul's great missionary activity. A Jew who withstood the preaching of The Gospel to the Gentiles is blinded, and a Gentile is a saved one in dramatic fashion of the sequel found in Acts twenty-eight, where the nation of Israel is blinded and salvation sent to the Gentiles. Acts 13:16-41 is the record of Paul's witness in the synagogue at Antioch, and it opens and closes with a reference to Israel, which involves the recognition of the "lo-ammi" principle.
The prophet Hosea supplies us with the title of Israel, 'Lo-ammi,' that provides a key to the fulfillment of prophecy and to the understanding of the present parenthetical Dispensation of The Mystery.
Hosea
The restoration of Israel symbolized and promised.
The prophecy of Hosea follows those of Jonah and Amos so far as chronological order is concerned but stands at the head of the twelve minor prophets in the Hebrew canon. The name Hosea is the Hebrew word for "salvation" and appears in chapter one of the Promise;
"But I will have mercy upon the house of Judah, and will SAVE them by the Lord their God, and will not SAVE them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen" (Hosea 1:7).
This promise might well be taken as the key promise of the prophecy. The word reappears in the closing section of the prophecy.
"Thou shalt have no god but Me; for there is no SAVIOUR beside Me" (Hos. 13:4).
"I will be thy King: where is any other that may SAVE thee in all thy cities?" (Hos. 13:10).
"Asshur shall not SAVE us; we will not ride upon horses; neither will we say any more to the work of our hands, Ye are our gods: for in Thee the fatherless findeth mercy" (Hos. 14:3).
The reader will not fail to observe how this last reference perfectly balances the first, even with the inclusion of the word "mercy." This insistence upon the words "salvation" and "save," suggested by the name of the Prophet, is a feature that is noticeable in another grouping of the prophets in the Hebrew canon. The term "prophet" covers some books that are historical rather than predictive and opens with the book of Joshua and closes with the book of the minor prophets, considered as one book. The "prophets," therefore, of the Hebrew canon open with "Joshua," the Salvation of the Lord, the Captain, and closes with "Joshua," the Salvation of the Lord, the High Priest. The whole prophetic section of the O.T. is bounded by the name borne by THE Saviour, for "Jesus" is but the Greek spelling of Joshua, as a reference to Acts 7:45 and Hebrews 4:8, will show.
A discussion on such a theme as "the nature of God" is naturally outside the scope of studies such as this, but none should be able to read the words "I will . . . save them by the LORD their God" (Hos. 1:7) without being struck by its peculiar phraseology. It is "The LORD" Who is the speaker, verse 4, "And the LORD said . . . I will avenge. . . I will break. . . And (God, the word supplied by the A.V.) said. . . I will no more. . . I will utterly. . . I will have mercy &c. and will save." If the passage had read, "I will save them by Myself," it would have been readily understood. It must be remembered that of "God, Absolute, and Unconditioned," we know and can know nothing. He Himself is greater than all His names and by His very nature Unnameable. In this verse in Hosea, we see, as it were, God Himself referring to Himself in the realm of the manifest and the conditioned. He is "Jehovah THEIR God," Who in the fullness of time became Man and was known as "The Man Christ Jesus."
The opening chapters of Hosea (1-3) are chiefly characterized by the fact that the Prophet enacts in his own family life the message that he has to tell, and this is followed by another section (4-14) in which the Prophet, while still using the symbol, speaks the message by word of mouth.
"The beginning of the word of the LORD by Hosea. And the LORD said to Hosea, Go take unto thee a wife" (Hos. 1:2).
"Go yet, love a woman" (Hos. 3:1).
"Hear the word of the LORD, ye children of Israel" (Hos. 4:1).
This is the continuance of the prophecy of Hosea. The word translated as "beginning" is not the same as that found in Genesis 1:1. It is the Hebrew chalal and is found again in the margin of Hosea 8:10, where the text reads "sorrow." It may appear strange to the casual reader that a word can mean either "beginning" or "sorrow," but the fact is that the idea of a "beginning" is a derived meaning, the primary idea of chalal being "to perforate," thence by stages "to lay open," "to give access and so profane or defile," and eventually "to begin" in the sense of "opening."
While a verbal connection between the word "beginning" and the subsequent strange episode in the life of the prophet would not be evident to the English reader, Hosea, who was commissioned by God to "take a wife of whoredoms" (Hos. 1:2) would scarcely fail to note the word "beginning" was derived from the word meaning "to lay open, profane, defile," and employed by Moses and other writers for the very pollution and profanation he was called upon to exhibit (Lev. 21:7, Lev. 21:9, Lev. 21:14, Lev. 19:29).
It does not necessarily follow that Gomer, the daughter of Diblaim, was an immoral woman. It means that she was of "Israel" as distinct from "Judah," for Israel, that is, the Ten Tribes, had become idolaters, having their own sanctuary at Beth-el. We have already learned about the "altars of Beth-el" from the prophet Amos, and Hosea refers to Beth-el in Hos. 10:15 and Hos. 12:4 in a markedly contrasted manner.
The two marriage contracts into which Hosea entered are highly significant and must now be examined.
- A Hos. 1:2. "Go take a wife of whoredoms"
- B Hos. 1:2. Meaning, the departure of the land from the LORD
- C Hos. 1:3. Hosea takes Gomer
- D Hos. 1:4-2:23.
- E Hos. 1:4-9. The three children.
- Prophetic Significance
a Jezreel'" I will avenge" - b Lo-ruhamah "Not. . . mercy"
- c Lo-ammi "Not My people"
- F Hos. 1:10-11, Hos. 2:1. Prophetic import of the three names
- F Hos. 2:2-22. The prophetic fulfillment of three names
- E Hos. 2:23. The three children.
- a Jezreel "I will sow"
- b Ruhamah "Mercy"
- c Ammi "My people"
- A Hos. 3:1. "Go yet love . . . an adulteress"
- B Hos. 3:1. Meaning. Israel, who looks to other gods
- C Hos. 3:2. Hosea buys her, with the price of a slave
- D Hos. 3:4,5
- E Hos. 3:4. Many days
- Prophetic Significance
- F Hos. 3:4. Abide without a king etc.
- E Hos. 3:5. Afterwards
- F Hos. 3:5. Return. . . Lord and David, their king
- E Hos. 3:5. Latter days.
It is evident by this disposition of the subject matter that these two marriage contracts entered into by the Prophet were intended to set forth in symbol the relationship of the Lord to (Prophetic Significance) Israel, their defection, the long period of their estrangement, and their final restoration.
The names of the three children who were born were most certainly given because of their typical meaning. The name of the wife, Gomer, does not appear to have been chosen because of its meaning but because of its association. Gomer was the name of a northern people of Japhetic origin (Gen. 10:2). Some believe that from these descended the Cimerii, the ancestors of the Cymry or the Welsh. Israel, by their sins and idolatry, had put themselves in the position of the far-off Gentiles. The three children of this marriage were named by God's instruction Jezreel, Lo-ruhamah, and Lo-ammi (Hos. 1:4, Hos. 1:6, and Hos. 1:9).
Jezreel. First, it should be observed that there is in this name a paronomasia between Israel (Yisrael) and Jezreel (Yizrael). Then, it must be remembered that two words similar in sound provide a further prophetic foreshadowing. The Hebrew word "to sow" is zara, and the Hebrew word "to scatter" is zarah, so the expressions "may God sow" and "may God scatter" appear very similar to the eye and ear in the original. Israel was to be "scattered" among the nations (Lev. 26:33, Jer. 31:10), but eventually, they were to be "sown" again in their own land (Jer. 31:27). The prophet Zechariah uses the word "sow" with the meaning equivalent to "scatter" (Zech. 10:9). The scattered tribes of Israel were known as "the dispersion" (Ezek. 12:15, John 7:35) and "the twelve tribes scattered abroad" (Jas. 1:1) where the Greek word for "seed" spora enters into the composition of the word diaspora "the dispersed or scattered."
In this name, therefore, of Hosea's firstborn son, the whole of Israel's history is compressed. They shall be scattered, but they shall at last be gathered. The names of the two children that followed are prophetic of the condition of Israel during this scattering, Lo-ruhamah meaning "not having obtained mercy," Lo-ammi meaning "not My people."
The "lo-ammi" period of Israel's scattering is of the utmost importance to the right understanding of the dispensational place of The Mystery and The Church of the One Body. Israel became "lo-ammi" at the time of Acts 28:28 when for the first time in history, it could be said "the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles" independently of Israel. In God's good time, a complete reversal will be made of all the conditions that are now associated with Israel's blindness, which reversal is the subject of Hosea 2:23. -
"I will sow," Jezreel, the second meaning attached to the Hebrew name;
"I will have mercy," removing the negative "lo" from the name Lo-ruhamah; and
"My people," removing the negative "lo" from the name lo-ammi. Great shall be the day of Jezreel when this blessed reversal takes place (Hos. 1:11).
The second relationship of Hosea is given in chapter three. The word translated "friend" in Hosea 3:1 is the Hebrew rea, which differs from the word translated "evil" in the vowel points and is usually translated as ra. The LXX translators translate this verse as "go yet, and love a woman that loves evil things and an adulteress," and it is in line with the truth for which this symbol stands that these words should refer to the same woman - Gomer - who had acted unfaithfully even as Israel had done. We sincerely hope that by so concluding, we have not said evil of an innocent person and must, of course, leave the matter to the judgment of the reader or, better still, to the judgment of "that day."
The woman in view had evidently become seriously involved, for the price paid by Hosea was the price demanded for the liberation of a slave. The symbolism of this new marital transaction is then explained:
"For the children of Israel shall abide many days without a King, and without a prince, and without a sacrifice, and without an image, and without an ephod, and without teraphim. Afterward shall the children of Israel return, and seek the LORD their God, and David their king: And shall fear the LORD and His goodness in the latter days" (Hos. 3:4-5).
The interval of the "many days" is to be characterized by a mutual "abiding" or "waiting." The woman was to "abide" without further unfaithfulness; the man would abide and wait also. This waiting negative attitude is explained by the sixfold negation of verse 4. Israel has had no "king" since the days of their captivity. On the other hand, the very scattering among the nations has made it impossible for any foreign prince to rule over them. Since the destruction of Jerusalem, Israel has been deprived of the right to offer sacrifice, but, since the days of their captivity, they have never again fallen under the old spell of idolatry; they have had no priest in the true sense of the word, but neither have they teraphim.
The Bible student needs no explanation of these terms, except perhaps the last, teraphim. This word is variously explained, but always with a consciousness that much to do with its origin and intention is unknown. Dr. J. E. Shelley contributed a suggestive article to the Bible League Quarterly in 1939 in which he speaks of the "generations" that compose the bulk of the Book of Genesis and suggests that these "ancestral tablets" were called teraphim by association with Terah the father of Abraham, and says that "certain Jewish legends represent Terah as actually a maker of idols." The word "teraphim" occurs but six times in the English of the A.V. All the references, apart from Hosea three, are found in Judges seventeen and eighteen. The word occurs, however, fifteen times altogether in the O. T., being translated as "image," "idolatry," and "idol." It was the teraphim that Rachel stole and hid (Gen. 31:19-35). It was the teraphim that Michal placed in the bed vacated by David (1 Sam. 19:13-16). In 1 Samuel 15:23, Ezekiel 21:21, and Zechariah 10:2, it will be seen that the teraphim were consulted and associated with witchcraft and divination.
"When the temple in Jerusalem was burned in A.D. 70, all the genealogical records of Israel's tribes were utterly destroyed. There is no man among the Jews today who can prove definitely of which tribe he is, by giving his genealogical records" (Dr. J. E. Shelley). Current DNA technology has begun to unravel the genealogical membership.
Israel had long been without a king when they entered their lo-ammi condition in Acts twenty-eight. The last thing to go at the destruction of the temple would have been their genealogical records. Since that date, Israel has "waited" and must wait until a priest stands up with Urim and Thummim - in other words until the Lord Himself returns.
The words of Hosea 6:1-2 suggest that the period covered by this "abiding" will be "two days," which in the symbolical use of the term may cover the two thousand years that may intervene before their complete restoration. As we have no certain knowledge as to when this period actually started, it is useless to attempt to compute the date of Israel's restoration, but we can read the signs of the times.
The return of Israel, with the confession that they will make, constitutes the closing chapter of this prophecy. All is graciously reversed. Instead of being lo-ammi and lo-ruhamah, the fatherless find mercy (Hos. 14:3). Their backsliding is healed, and this restored people grow as the lily, have the beauty of the olive, the odor of Lebanon, with their fruit derived alone from the Lord.
Finally, let us never forget that not only will Israel be "not My people" during this dark period of their history, but God declared, "I will not be your God."
Let those who treat the record of Acts twenty-eight with scant concern think again what the intervening nineteen hundred years would have been like had no parenthetical dispensation come into being.
We hope this helps,
The Believers
Dear Believer.com
I am curious as to why you use the term mystery so much? Reminds me of the Catholic church which I left. The Bible is pretty readable.
To me, Mystery is just a way to say that you don’t have an explanation for it. I don’t find too many mysteries in the Bible. Is this a Catholic site?
Jose
Dear Jose,
God Bless you, and thank you for writing. We use the word Mystery because that is our ministry. That is not to say it is because our ministry is hard to understand or difficult to find out. The word Mystery can also be translated Secret (which is its meaning in Greek), and once a secret is revealed it is easy to understand. There are many ministries in the world today, but this is the one we have been called to:
Eph 3:9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:
Eph 3:3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words,
Eph 3:4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)
Eph 3:5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;
Eph 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
Most Christians today are not aware of this great Secret or don't really understand what it means, and yet God wants:
Eph 1:17 That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him:
Eph 1:18 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints,
Only those who believe God can please Him, and God wants us to see and believe The Truth of The Mystery.
Eph 1:22 And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church,
Eph 1:23 Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
Look closely; it says His Body, not His Bride or His Wife, as so many teach, and no, The Body is not the Bride nor the Bride His Body, for that teaching is not Scriptural and is a different kind of mystery. Only those who believe what God has written can:
Eph 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
Eph 1:4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
Eph 1:5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
Eph 1:6 To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.
Now, ALL that call upon the Name of The Lord are saved, but only those who believe what God has written as doctrine for The Church today have every Blessing that is Spiritual in The Heavenly Places.
All God's Blessings,
The Believers
Michael wrote:
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
I would be so grateful to learn the supporting scripture to the Conclusion of this teaching. I admit much more study is required on my part. My confusion stems from the last 2 sentences which states,
'After His presentation to all the powers of the heavens, and His coronation, He will then go earthward and set up His kingdom among the nations'. I remember reading elsewhere in your teachings that the earthly kingdom had been postponed to a future unknown time. Is this teaching referring to that future unknown time? Is this future time the thousand year reign of Christ and White Throne judging. Praise God and our Lord and Savior Christ Jesus.
Thank you,
Michael
Three Spheres Of Blessing
The Earth, The Heavenly City, Far above all
Dear Michael,
God Bless you, and thank you for writing. The best way to explain your questions is to talk about hope and the different spheres of blessings.
Where we read of "hope" in the New Testament, we often find in the context a reference either to a "promise" or to a "calling." For example, Paul before Agrippa says:
"And now I stand and am judged for The Hope Of The Promise made of God unto our fathers; unto which promise Our Twelve Tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come" (Acts 26:6-7).
Here there is no possibility of making a mistake. Not only is the hope that is in view the fulfillment of a promise, but it is the fulfillment of a specific promise "made of God unto our fathers." Further, there is no ambiguity as to those who entertain this hope; the words "our twelve tribes" are too explicit to permit spiritualizing. For the moment, it is sufficient that the principle should be clear that Hope Looks To The Fulfillment Of A Promise. It is, therefore, necessary to discover what promise has been made to any particular company before we can speak with understanding of their hope. Another prerequisite is knowledge of the "calling" concerned.
"That ye may know what is THE HOPE OF HIS CALLING" (Eph. 1:18).
"Even as ye are called in ONE HOPE OF YOUR CALLING" (Eph. 4:4).
The realization of our hope in the future will be in agreement with our calling now by faith.
"Now faith is the substance of things HOPED for" (Heb. 11:1).
Recent discoveries among the papyri of Egypt have brought to light the fact that the word "substance" was used in New Testament times to signify the "Title Deeds" of a property. Every believer holds the title deeds now, by faith, the earnest and first fruits of the inheritance that will be entered when his hope is realized. As every believer does not necessarily belong to the same calling, and most believers grant a distinction between Kingdom and Church, while some realize the further distinction between Bride and Body, it follows that the character of the calling must be settled before the hope can be defined.
Three Spheres Of Blessing
There are at least three distinct spheres of blessing indicated in the New Testament:
The Earth. - "Blessed are the meek; for they shall inherit the earth" (Matt. 5:5).
The Heavenly City. - "The city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem . . . and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven" (Heb. 12:22-23).
Far above all. - "He ascended up, far above all heavens" (Eph.4:10). "And made us sit together in heavenly places" (Eph. 2:6).
These three spheres of blessing correspond to three distinct callings:
The Kingdom. - "Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth" (Matt. 6:10).
The Bride. - "The Bride, the Lamb's wife . . . the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God" (Rev. 21:9-10).
The Body. - "His body. . . the church: whereof I (Paul) am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you . . . the mystery which hath been hidden from ages and from generations" (Col. 1:24-26).
These three spheres of blessing, each with its special calling, have associated with them three groups of people in the N.T. The first sphere of blessing is exclusive to Israel according to the flesh, the second to believers from among both "Jew and Greek," while in the third sphere, the calling is addressed to "You Gentiles."
Israel according to the flesh. - "My kinsmen according to the flesh, who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises, whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, Who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen" (Rom. 9:3-5).
Abraham's seed (includes believing Gentiles). - "Having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?. . . they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. . . . For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ, have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek . . . for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise" (Gal. 3:3, Gal. 3:7, Gal. 3:9, Gal. 3:27-29).
If, at the end of Gal. 27:28, we "shut the book," we may "prove" that the blessed unity indicated by the words "neither Jew nor Greek" refers to the "Church which is His Body." If, however, we keep the book open, we see that such is not the sequel but that this new company is "Abraham's seed" and the hope before them, "the promise" made to Abraham. The reader may readily assent to this, but we would urge him to remember that 1 Thessalonians and Galatians were both written before Acts 28:27-28 and, therefore, before the revelation of The Mystery. The hope then of 1 Thessalonians four belongs to the same calling as that of Galatians and cannot constitute The Hope of The Mystery.
The One New Man. - "Where there is neither Greek nor Jew . . . but Christ is all and in all" (Col. 3:11).
"That He might create in Himself of the twain one new man, so making peace" (Eph. 2:15 R.V.).
"That the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs" (Eph. 3:6).
Space will not permit extensive proofs of the suggestions made in the foregoing paragraphs or of a detailed exposition of the passages concerned, but we believe that the matter is sufficiently clear for us to go forward with our inquiry. Seeing then that there are Three Spheres of Blessing, with their three associated callings, we should expect to find three phases of The Coming of The Lord. These three phases are presented in the following Scriptures:
Kingdom on earth. - HOPE. Matt. 24-25.
Abraham's seed (heavenly calling). - HOPE. 1 Thess. 4.
Far above all. - HOPE. Col. 3:4.
Let us look at each phase of the Second Advent as presented by these three passages.
The Hope Of The First Sphere
The Sign of the Coming of the Son of Man
The earthly ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ was limited to the people of Israel and had special regard to the promise made to David concerning Israel's King. It also had in view the promise made to Abraham concerning the blessing of all the families of the earth, but did not, at that time, extend to them, being concentrated rather upon Israel from whom, as the appointed channel, the blessing should flow to all nations. We shall now bring Scriptural proof of these statements and then proceed to show that Matthew 24 and 25 speak of the hope of Israel and that this phase of the second advent has nothing to do with the Hope of The "church."
Proof that the earthly ministry was limited in the first instance to Israel.
"Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the CIRCUMCISION for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the FATHERS" (Rom. 15:8).
"Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL" (Matt. 10:5-6).
"I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL" (Matt. 15:24).
Proof that the promise made to David concerning a King was in view.
"Where is He that is born KING of the Jews?. . . in Bethlehem" (Matt. 2:2-5).
"Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy KING cometh unto thee" (Matt. 21:5).
"What think ye of Christ, whose Son is He? They say unto Him, The Son of DAVID" (Matt. 22:42).
"David. . . being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, HE WOULD RAISE UP CHRIST TO SIT ON HIS THRONE; He seeing this before, spake of the resurrection of Christ" (Acts 2:30-31).
Proof that the promise to Abraham concerning Israel as the chosen channel of blessing to the Gentiles was in view.
"Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. UNTO YOU FIRST God, having raised up His Son Jesus, sent Him to bless YOU, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities" (Acts 3:25-26).
The consideration of these Scriptures in their setting provides sufficient proof for the statements made concerning the character of the Saviour's earthly ministry.
We are now in a position to consider Matthew twenty-four and twenty-five, which is a prophecy of the second coming of Christ, and concerns the hope of Israel as distinct from the hope of the church.
The threefold prophecy of the coming of the Lord, as revealed in Matthew 24 was given in answer to the threefold question of the disciples-
"When shall these things be?"
"What shall be the sign of Thy coming?"
"And the end of the world (age)?"
The evidence which follows sufficiently shows that in this passage, the Hope of Israel and not the Hope of "The Church which is His Body" is the subject.
Three proofs that Matthew twenty-four speaks of the Hope of Israel
First, the word translated "end" is sunteleia, a word at that time well known to every Jew, for it was the name of the third great feast, namely "the feast of ingathering, which is at the end of the year" (Exod. 23:16). This is evidence that Israel's hope is in view.
Secondly, we find that this coming of the Lord is to be preceded by "wars and rumors of wars." Because of the fact that there have been, and yet will be, many wars and rumors of wars since the setting aside of Israel, these words, as they stand, cannot be construed as evidence that Israel's hope is in view. If, however, we turn to the O.T. origin of the reference: "For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom" (Matt. 24:7), we shall see that it comes from Isaiah's prophetic "Burden of Egypt" (Isa. 19:1-2), the passage ending with the words "Blessed be Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands, and Israel Mine inheritance" (Isa. 19:25). This reference, therefore, when seen in the light of its O.T. setting, gives further evidence for the fact that Israel is in view in Matthew 24.
Thirdly, this coming of the Lord takes place after the prophetic statements of Daniel 9:27 and Dan. 12:11 have been fulfilled.
"When ye, therefore, shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place . . . then shall be great tribulation . . . IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TRIBULATION of those days . . . shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven . . . and they shall see the Son of man COMING IN THE CLOUDS OF HEAVEN" (Matt. 24:15-30).
These three items provide proof beyond dispute that the second coming of Christ, as here made known, cannot be the hope of the church.
The Hope Of The Second Sphere
The Acts and Epistles of the Period
We must now turn our attention to the evidence of Scripture as to the character of the Hope during the period covered by the Acts of the Apostles. Some commentators on this Book appear to forget that it is the record of the "Acts" of the Apostles and had no existence until those "Acts" were accomplished. If the founding of the church at Corinth chronicled in Acts 18 is an act of the apostle Paul, both Crispus (Acts 18:8) and Sosthenes (Acts 18:17) being mentioned by name, then the Epistle written by the same apostle to the same church, again mentioning Crispus and Sosthenes by name, must be included as the Divine complement of the record of Acts 18. The aspect of the Hope in view in the Acts and in The Epistles written during that period to the churches founded by the Apostles must, of necessity, be the same. Any attempt to make the ministry of Paul during the Acts differ from The Epistles of the same period is false and must be rejected. There can be no doubt that the Hope entertained by the churches during the period covered by the Acts of the Apostles was a phase of the Hope of Israel. This will, we trust, be made clear by the quotations and comments given hereafter.
"When they therefore were come together, they asked of Him, saying, Lord, wilt Thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?" (Acts 1:6).
This question arose after the forty days' instruction given by the risen Christ to His disciples, during which time He not only opened the Scriptures but "their understanding" also (Luke 24:45).
"Repent . . . and He shall send Jesus Christ, Which before was preached unto you: Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began. . . . Ye are the children of the prophets. . . . Unto you first. . ." (Acts 3:19-26).
These words of Peter, spoken after Pentecost, cannot be separated from the hope of Israel without violence to the inspired words. It may be that some readers will interpose the thought: "These are from the testimony of Peter; what we want is the testimony of Paul." We, therefore, give two more extracts from the Acts, quoting this time from the ministry of Paul.
"And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers: unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come" (Acts 26:6-7).
"Paul called the chief of the Jews together . . . because that for the hope of Israel I am bound with this chain" (Acts 28:17-20).
Not until the Jewish people were set aside in Acts 28:25-29 does Paul become "the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles." Until it was a settled fact that Israel would not repent and that the promise of Acts 3:19-26 would be postponed, the Hope of Israel persisted, and all the churches that had been brought into being up to that time were of necessity associated with that Hope. See the testimony of Romans, which is set out in much fuller detail after the reference to the heavenly calling is completed.
The Heavenly Calling
We have already drawn attention to the intimate association that exists between "hope," "promise," and "calling." We must pause for a moment here to remind the reader that Abraham stands at the head of two companies: an earthly people, the great nation of Israel, and a heavenly people, associated with the heavenly phase of God's promise to Abraham, and made up of the believing remnant of Israel and believing Gentiles. The Apostle in Hebrews and Galatians refers to this heavenly side of the Abrahamic promise:
"He looked for a city. . . . They seek a country. . . . They desire a better country, that is, an heavenly; wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for He hath prepared for them a city" (Heb. 11:10, Heb. 11:14, Heb. 11:16).
"If ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. . . . Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother' of us all" (Gal. 3:29, (Gal. 4:26).
This heavenly calling of the Abrahamic promise constitutes the Bride of the Lamb, as distinct from the restored Wife, which refers to Israel as a nation. We leave the reader to verify these statements for himself by referring to Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Hosea, where Israel's restoration is spoken of under the figure of the restored Wife, and to the Book of Revelation, where the Heavenly City is described as the Bride. During the time of the Acts of the Apostles, the churches founded by Paul were "Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise" (Gal. 3:29). The Apostle speaks of "espousing them to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ" (2 Cor. 11:2).
This heavenly phase of the hope of Israel was the hope of all the churches established during the Acts until Israel was set aside, as recorded in Acts 28.
The Testimony of Romans
The Epistles written by Paul before his imprisonment were Galatians, Hebrews, Romans, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, and 1 and 2 Corinthians. We are sure that any well-instructed reader who was asked to choose from this set of Epistles, the one giving the most recent as well as the most fundamental teaching of the apostle for this period, would unhesitatingly choose the Epistle to the Romans. In this Epistle, we have the solid rock foundation of justification by faith, where "no difference" can be tolerated between Jew and Gentile. When, however, we leave the sphere of doctrine (Rom. 1-8) and enter the sphere of dispensational privileges, we discover that differences between Jewish and Gentile believers remain. The Gentile, who was justified by faith, was nevertheless reminded that he was at that time in the position of a wild olive, graft into the true olive tree, from which some of the branches had been broken off through unbelief. The grafting of the Gentile into Israel's olive tree was intended (speaking after the manner of men) to provoke Israel into jealousy. When, in the days to come, these broken branches shall be restored, "All Israel shall be saved."
These statements from Romans 11 are sufficient to prevent us from assuming that, because there is evidently DOCTRINAL equality in the Acts period, there is also DISPENSATIONAL equality. This is not so, for Romans declare that the Jew is still "first," and the middle wall still stands, making membership of The One Body as revealed in Ephesians impossible.
In Romans 15, we have a definite statement concerning the Hope entertained by the church at Rome. Before quoting the passage, Romans 15:12-13, we would advise the reader that the word "trust" in Rom. 15:12 is elpizo, and the word "hope" in Rom. 15:13 elpis. There is also the emphatic article "the" before the word "hope" in Rom. 15:12. Bearing these points in mind, we can now examine The Hope entertained by the church in Rome, as ministered to by Paul before his imprisonment.
"There shall be a Root of Jesse, and He that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles; in Him shall the Gentiles hope. Now the God of that hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, that ye may abound in hope, through the power of the Holy Ghost" (Rom. 15:12-13).
Here we are on firm ground. Paul himself teaches the church to look for The Millennial Kingdom and for The Saviour as the "Root of Jesse," Who shall "reign over the Gentiles." How can this hope be severed from "the hope of Israel"? How can it be associated with the "Mystery," which knows nothing of Abraham or of Israel but goes back before the "foundation of the world" and reaches up to Heavenly Places? In case the reader should be uncertain of Paul's references to The Millennial Kingdom, we quote from Isaiah eleven:
"And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse. . . . He shall smite the earth with the rod of His mouth, and with the breath of His lips shall He slay the wicked. . . . The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb. . . . And in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to It shall the Gentiles seek: and His rest shall be glorious" (Isa. 11:1, Isa. 11:4, Isa. 11:6, Isa. 11:10).
The reader should consult the note on Isaiah 11:4 given in The Companion Bible, where the reading, "He shall smite the oppressor" (ariz) is preferred to the A.V. "He shall smite the earth" (erez). This reading establishes a link with 2 Thessalonians 2:8:
"And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming."
Before referring to 1 Thessalonians 4, which presents the Hope of the church at that time very clearly, we must say something about the strange avoidance of the second Epistle that so many manifest when dealing with this subject.
The Importance of a Second Epistle
If a businessman were to treat his correspondence in the way that some believers treat The Epistles of Paul, the results would be disastrous. A second letter, purporting to rectify a misunderstanding arising out of a previous letter, would, if anything, be more important and more decisive than the first; yet there are those whose system of interpretation demands that they shall claim 1 Thessalonians 4 as the revelation of their hope, who nevertheless either neglect the testimony of 2 Thessalonians or explain it away as of some future mystical company unknown to the Apostle. Let us first verify that these two Epistles form a definite pair, written by the same writer, at the same period, to the same people, about the same subject.
Identity of Address
FIRST EPISTLE "Paul, and Silvanus, and Timotheus, unto the church of the Thessalonians which is in God the Father and in the Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Thess. 1:1).
SECOND EPISTLE "Paul, and Silvanus, and Timotheus, unto the church of the Thessalonians in God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" (2 Thess. 1:1).
Identity of Theme
FIRST EPISTLE "Remembering without ceasing your work of faith, and labour of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, in the sight of God and our Father" (1 Thess. 1:3).
SECOND EPISTLE "We are bound to thank God always for you, brethren, as it is meet; because that your faith groweth exceedingly, and the love of every one of you all towards each other aboundeth; so that we . . . glory . . . in your patience" (2 Thess. 1:3).
FIRST EPISTLE "The coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all His saints" (1 Thess. 3:13). (A reference to Deut. 33:2, Psa. 68:17 and Zech. 14:5 will show that the "saints" here are the "holy angels" and not the church).
SECOND EPISTLE "The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire" (2 Thess. 1:7-8).
The Special Purpose of Second Thessalonians
The Thessalonian Church had been disturbed by the circulation of a letter purporting to have come from the Apostle and by certain messages given by those who claimed to have "the spirit." These messages distorted the Apostle's teaching concerning the coming of the Lord, as taught in the church while he was with them and mentioned in the fourth chapter of his letter.
"We beseech you, brethren . . . that ye be not soon shaken in mind or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ (or the Lord) is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first" (2 Thess. 2:1-3).
Before the Hope of the church at Thessalonica could be realized, certain important prophecies awaited fulfillment. As we have seen, the Hope during the period of the Acts (and therefore that of 1 Thessalonians 4) was essentially the Hope of Israel. When 1 Thessalonians 4 was written, Israel was still God's people. The Temple still stood, and the possibility (speaking humanly) of Israel's repentance had still to be reckoned with. If the Hope of Israel was about to be fulfilled, then Daniel 9-12 must also be fulfilled, together with many other prophecies of the time of the end. This we have seen to have been the testimony of the Lord Himself in Matthew 24, and so far, Israel had not been set aside (i.e., when the epistles to the Thessalonians were written).
The following predicted events must precede the coming of the Lord as revealed in 1 and 2 Thessalonians:
The apostasy must come first ("falling away," Greek apostasia).
The Man of Sin must be revealed in the Temple (the word "Temple" is the same as in Matthew 23:16).
The coming of this Wicked One will be preceded by a Satanic travesty of Pentecostal gifts. (The same words are used as of Pentecost, with the addition of the word "lying".)
This Wicked One shall be "consumed" and "destroyed" with the brightness of the Lord's coming (see Isaiah 11:4, revised reading).
All this the Apostle had told the Thessalonian church when he was with them before he wrote 1 Thessalonians 4 (see 2 Thess. 2:5).
The Thessalonians had already been taught by the Apostle himself concerning the events of prophecy and would doubtless have read 1 Thessalonians four in harmony with his teaching had they not been deceived by false interpretations. The reference to the Archangel would have taken them back to Daniel 10-12. The Epistle of Jude uses exactly the same word as is used here and tells us that the Archangel's name is Michael (Jude 9). Immediately following the great prophecy of the seventy weeks, with its climax in the "Abomination of desolation," we have the revelation of Daniel ten. There the veil is partially withdrawn, and a glimpse is given of the Satanic forces behind the "powers that be." Michael is said to be "your Prince," and in Daniel 12 we read:
"And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation . . . and many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake" (Dan. 12:1-2).
Here we have Michael identified with the people of Israel, and when he stands up, the great tribulation and the resurrection take place. This FOLLOWS THE EVENTS OF DANIEL ELEVEN, which are briefly summarized in 2 Thessalonians two. Compare, for example, the following passages:
"He shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvelous things against the God of gods" (Dan. 11:36).
"Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped" (2 Thess. 2:4).
1 and 2 Thessalonians and Revelation 13
If the reader would read consecutively Daniel 9, 10, 11, and 12, 1 Thessalonians 4 and 5, 2 Thessalonians 1 and 3, and Revelation 13, the testimony of the truth itself would be so strong as to need no human advocate. Our space is limited, and we therefore earnestly ask all who value the teaching of the Scriptures regarding "That Blessed Hope" to read and compare these portions most carefully and prayerfully. When this is done, let the question be answered: "What have all these Scriptures to do with The Church of The Dispensation of The Mystery, a Church called into being consequent upon Israel's removal and the suspension of Israel's hope?" The answer can only be that, while the close association of the Hope of the Thessalonians with the Hope of Israel was consistent with the character of the dispensation then in force, the attempt to link the "One Hope of our Calling" with prophetic times is a dispensational anachronism and a failure to distinguish things that differ.
"Till He Come"
The coming of the Lord referred to in 1 Corinthians 11:26 must be the same Hope as was entertained by the Thessalonians and by the church at Rome (Rom. 15:12-13). The Apostle himself summarizes this Hope in Acts 28:20 as the "Hope of Israel." The Corinthian Epistle deals with a variety of subjects and is addressed to different sections of the church. Some called themselves by the name of Paul, others by the name of Cephas. Some were troubled with regard to the question of marriage, and others with regard to moral questions. The section in which the words "till He come" occur is addressed to those whose "fathers" were "baptized unto Moses" (1 Cor. 10:1), whereas the section that immediately follows is addressed to Gentiles (1 Cor. 12:2). Concerning the question of marriage, the Apostle writes:
"I suppose therefore that this is good for the present distress. . . . The time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none; and they that weep, as though they wept not. . . and they that buy, as though they possessed not" (1 Cor. 7:26-30).
Shall we fall into the error of teaching, as some have taught, that marriage is wrong because of what Paul says in this chapter? If we do, what shall we say of his wonderful words concerning husband and wife in Ephesians 5? Or of his advice that the younger women should not only marry but marry again if left as widows? (1 Tim. 5:9-14). The right interpretation is clearly that Paul's advice in 1 Corinthians 7 was true AT THE TIME because the Second Coming of Christ was expected to take place during the lifetime of some of his hearers. He speaks as he does "because of the present necessity" and because "the time is short." When writing to the Thessalonians, he rightly identifies himself with the imminent Hope of the Lord's Coming by saying: "We which are alive" (1 Thess. 4).
The "present necessity" of 1 Corinthians 7 is no longer applicable on account of the failure of Israel and the suspension of their Hope. So in 1 Corinthians 11, the teaching of the chapter was only true while the Hope of that calling was still imminent. When the people of Israel passed into their present condition of blindness, as they did in Acts 28, their Hope passed with them, not to be revived until the end of the days, when the Apocalypse is fulfilled. Meanwhile, a new dispensation has come in, a dispensation associated with a "Mystery" and unconnected with Israel. In the very nature of things, a change of dispensation means a change of calling. It introduces a new sphere and a fresh set of promises and demands a re-statement of its own peculiar hope.
Hope Of The Third Sphere
The Manifestation in Glory
Before considering the special characteristics of The Hope of The Church of The One Body, it may be of service to set out some of the distinctive features of the Dispensation of The Mystery so that, perceiving the unique character of its calling, we shall be compelled to believe the unique character of its Hope.
Special features of the present dispensation:
First of all, let us observe two features that marked the previous dispensation but are now absent.
The presence and prominence of Israel.
The testimony of the Gospels (Matt. 10:6, Matt. 15:24), the witness of Peter (Acts 3:25-26), and the testimony of Paul (Rom. 1:16, Rom. 3:29, Rom. 9:1-5, Rom. 11:24-25 and Rom. 15:8), all combine to show that the nation of Israel was an important factor in the outworking of the purpose of the ages and that during the period covered by the Gospels and the Acts, no blessing could be enjoyed by a Gentile in the independence of Israel. It is evident that with the setting aside of these favored people, a change in dispensation was necessitated.
The presence and prominence of miraculous gifts.
Throughout the public ministry of the Lord Jesus, and from Pentecost in Acts 2 until the shipwreck on the island of Melita in Acts 28, supernatural signs, wonders, and miracles accompanied and confirmed the preached word. Not only did the Lord Himself and also His apostles work miracles, but during the time of the Acts, ordinary members of the church were in possession of spiritual gifts in such abundance that they had to seek the Apostle's advice as to their regulation in the assembly (1 Cor. 14:26-40). The miracles of Mark 16, Acts 2, and 1 Corinthians 12 to 14 are not the normal experience of the church of today. Their absence, together with the setting aside of the people of Israel, constitute two pieces of negative evidence in favor of a new dispensation. We are not, however, limited to negative evidence. Scripture also provides definite evidence of a positive kind, which we must now consider.
The prison ministry of the Apostle Paul.
When Paul spoke to the elders of the church at Ephesus, he made it quite plain that one ministry was coming to an end and another, closely associated with prison, was about to begin. He reviewed his past services among them and told them, among other things, that they should see his face no more (Acts 20:17-38). Later, before King Agrippa, he reveals the important fact that when he was converted and commissioned by The Lord, in Acts nine, he had been told that at some subsequent time, the Lord would appear to him again and give him a second commission (Acts 26:15-18).
The dispensational boundary of Acts 28.
Right up to the last Chapter of the Acts, Israel, and miraculous gifts continued to occupy their pre-eminent place (Acts 28:1-10, Acts 28:17, Acts 28:20). Upon arrival at Rome, Paul, although desirous of visiting the church (Rom. 1:11-13), sent first for the "chief of the Jews", telling them that "for the hope of Israel" he was bound with a chain. After spending a whole day with these men of Israel, seeking unsuccessfully to persuade them "concerning Jesus" out of the law and the prophets, he pronounces finally their present doom of blindness, adding:
"Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it" (Acts 28:28).
During the two years of imprisonment that followed, the Apostle ministered to all that came to him, teaching those things which "concern the Lord Jesus Christ" with no reference this time either to the law or to the prophets (Acts 28:30-31).
The present dispensation is a new revelation.
The omission of "the law and the prophets" from Acts 28:31, as compared with Acts 28:23, is an important point. Throughout the early ministry of the Apostle, he makes continual and repeated appeals to the O.T. Scriptures. But when one examines the "Prison Epistles," one is struck by the absence of quotation. The reason for this change is that Paul, as the prisoner of Jesus Christ for the Gentiles, received The Mystery "by revelation" (Eph. 3:1-3). This mystery had been hidden for ages and generations until the time came for Paul to be made its minister (Col. 1:24-27). It could not, therefore, be found in the O.T. Scriptures.
Some special features of this new calling.
This Church was chosen "before the foundation of the world" (Eph. 1:4) and "before age-times" (2 Tim. 1:9).
This Church finds its sphere of blessing "in Heavenly P1aces, far above all principality and power. . . seated together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus" (Eph. 1:3, Eph. 1:20-21, Eph. 2:6).
This Church is not an "evolution" but a new "creation," the peculiar advantage of being a Jew, even though a member of The Church, having disappeared with the middle wall of partition (Eph. 2:14-19).
This Church is The One Body of which Christ is The Head, and in which all members are equal (Eph. 1:22-23, Eph. 3:6), a relationship never before known.
The Prison Epistles.
While the very nature of things demands a new dispensation consequent upon Israel's removal, we are not left to mere inference. There is a definite section of the N.T. with special teaching relating to The Church of the present dispensation. This is found in the epistles written by Paul as the prisoner of the Lord for us Gentiles. These epistles are five in number, but we generally refer to the "four Prison Epistles" as that to Philemon is practical and personal and makes no contribution to the new teaching.
The four Prison Epistles are:
A EPHESIANS. The Dispensation of the Mystery. Basic Truth
B PHILIPPIANS. The Prize. Outworking.
A COLOSSIANS. The Dispensation of the Mystery. Basic Truth
B 2 TIMOTHY. The Crown. Outworking.
The reader will find in each of these Epistles evidence that they were written from prison and that they form part of the ministry referred to in Acts 28:31.
The above notes on these seven features are necessarily brief and are not intended to do anything more than provide the merest outline of the subject. Any reader who is not convinced as to the peculiar and unique character of these Prison Epistles and The Dispensation they reveal should give them a personal study, noting all their claims and their distinctive features. This article has not been written to prove to the satisfaction of all that a new dispensation commenced at the time of Acts 28 but has been prepared rather as a help to those who, having realized that a change most certainly did take place in the dispensational dealings of God with men at that time, desire to understand what effect this change had upon The Hope of The Church.
The new phase of Hope necessitates Prayer
While prayer should accompany the Word at all times, there is no need to pray for "revelation" concerning one's hope if it is already revealed. Words can scarcely be clearer than those employed in 1 Thessalonians 4, and if this chapter still represented the hope of the Church of the One Body, there would be no need for the Apostle to speak as he does in Ephesians 1. In Eph 1:17, he prays that the saints might receive "the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him . . . that ye may know what is the hope of His calling" (Eph. 1:17-18).
It might be well if the reader pondered the marginal reading of Ephesians 1:17 where, instead of "in the knowledge of Him," we read, "for the acknowledging of Him." This raises a most important point. Many fail to go forward with the truth, not because of an inability to understand the meaning of plain terms, but because of failure to "acknowledge Him." The Apostle pauses in his teaching to tell his hearers that before another step can be taken, acknowledgment of what has already been revealed must be made. To acknowledge The Truth of The Mystery is to put oneself out of favor with denominationalism, and many a child of God who says, "I do not see it," is really making a confession of failure to acknowledge the revelation of Truth connected with the ascended Lord.
This new phase of Hope is associated with a Promise
We have already seen that hope and promise are necessarily linked together. We discovered that the promises that were the basis of expectation during the Acts were the promises "made unto the fathers." Now the fathers had no promises made to them concerning heavenly places "where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God." They knew nothing of a church where Gentile believers would be in perfect equality with Jewish believers. The promises made to the fathers never extended beyond "the Bride" or "the Heavenly Jerusalem," but in Ephesians, we have "The Body" and a sphere "Far Above All."
In Ephesians 1:12, where the A.V. reads "first trusted," the margin reads "Hoped,"; and as we cannot speak of "the blessed trust" or "the trust of the second coming" it is best to keep to the translation, "hope." The actual word used is proelpizo, to "fore-hope." Of this prior Hope, the Holy Spirit is the seal and, as such, is "the Holy Spirit of promise."
What promise is in view? There is but one promise in the Prison Epistles. The Gentiles who formed The Church of the One Body were by nature
"aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise" (Eph. 2:12),
but through grace, they became
"fellow-heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ by the gospel; whereof I (Paul) was made a minister" (Eph. 3:6-7).
This promise takes us back to the period of Ephesians 1:4, "before the foundation of the world":
"According to the promise of life, which is in Christ Jesus . . . according to His own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus, before the world began" (before age-times) (2 Tim. 1:1, 2 Tim. 1:9).
It is this one unique promise that will be realized when the blessed hope before the church of the One Body is fulfilled. Its realization is described by the Apostle in Colossians three:
"When Christ, Who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with Rim in glory" (Col. 3:4).
It is impossible to defer this "appearing" until after the Millennium, for the church is waiting for "Christ their fife" and so awaiting "the promise of life," which is their hope. The word "appearing" might be translated as "manifestation" and will be familiar to most readers in the term "epiphany."
Parousia and Epiphany
Believing as we do that all Scripture is given by inspiration of God, we must be careful to distinguish between the different words used by God when speaking of the hope of His people. We observe that the word parousia, usually translated as "coming," is found in such passages as the following:
"What shall be the sign of Thy COMING and of the end of the age?" (Matt. 24:3).
"The COMING of the Lord" (1 Thess. 4:15).
"The COMING of our Lord Jesus Christ" (2 Thess. 2:1).
"They that are Christ's at His COMING" (1 Cor. 15:23).
"The COMING of the Lord draweth nigh" (Jas. 5:8).
"The promise of His COMING" (2 Pet. 3:4).
"Not ashamed before Him at His COMING" (1 John 2:28).
This word is used to describe the Hope of the church during the period when "the hope of Israel" was still in view. Consequently, we find it used in the Gospel of Matthew, by Peter, James, and John, ministers of 'the circumcision', and by Paul in those epistles written before the dispensational change of Acts 28.
A different word is used in the Prison Epistles. There, the word parousia is never used for the Lord's coming or of The Hope of The church, but the word epiphany. In 1 Thessalonians 4, the Lord descends from heaven; in 2 Thessalonians 1, He is to be revealed from heaven. This is very different from being Manifested "in glory," i.e., where Christ now sits "on the right hand of God." While, therefore, the Hope before all other companies of the redeemed is "the Lord's coming," the "prior hope" of The Church of The Mystery is rather "their going" to be "manifested with Him in Glory."
While the epistle to Titus is not a "Prison Epistle," it belongs to the same group as 1 and 2 Timothy. There, too, we read that we should live
"looking for that blessed hope, and the manifestation of the glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ" (Titus 2:13).
The Marriage of the King's Son
We may perhaps illustrate these different aspects of the Second Advent by using the occasion of the marriage of the King of England at Westminster Abbey. The marriage is one, whether witnessed in the Abbey itself, from a grandstand, or from the public footway. So, whatever our calling, The Hope is one in this respect, that it is Christ Himself. Nevertheless, we cannot conceive of anyone denying that to be permitted to be present in the Abbey itself is something different from sitting in a grandstand until the King's son, accompanied by "shout" and "trumpet," descends from the Abbey to be met by the waiting people. These waiting people outside the Abbey form one great company, although differentiated as to point of view. So the early church, together with the Kingdom saints, form one great company, although some, like Abraham, belong to "the heavenly calling" connected with Jerusalem that is above, while others belong to the Kingdom, which is to be "on earth." We can hardly believe that any subject of the King would "prefer" the grandstand or the curb to the closer association of the Abbey itself, and we can hardly believe that any redeemed child of God would "prefer" to wait on earth for the descent of the Lord from heaven if the "Manifestation with Him in Glory" were a possible Hope before him. We cannot, however, force these things upon the heart and conscience. We can only respond to the exhortation to be "ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of The Hope that is in you with meekness and reverence" (1 Pet. 3:15).
All God's Blessings,
The Believers
Ephesians 4:5
One Lord, one faith, one baptism,
Don and Dannie wrote:
Well for one thing that's not what the bible says about baptism,; Acts 8 is the story of the Eunch and Philip.; After Philip taught him about Jesus beginning from Is. 53.7-8,; I am sure Philip told the Eunich about how Jesus was put to death and the lesson must have gotten around to baptism because the Eunch said, "here is water.; What hinders me from baptism". Philip said "if you believe you may".; v.38, "they both went down into the water".
Also look at Acts 10:47-48, " Can any forbid water that, these should not be baptized.. See v.48,; And he commanded then to be baptized.
You will recall this is the story of Cornelius, this is the time the; non-Jews received the special measure of the Holy Spirit, the same as was happened to the Apostles on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2.
The Christian baptism is a re-enactment of Jesus' death, burial and resurrection.; The very word baptism means to "dip, plunge or emerge in water"; So you may be raised to walk in a newness of life. Rom. 6:4.;; It is in this very act that our past sins are taken away, forgiving,; "freed from sins" v.7
In Acts 22:16; Paul is telling of his conversion,; he says he was told "to arise and be baptized and wash away his sins".; Saul (Paul) was told on the road what to do, to go into the city.; where someone would tell what he must do.; He was a believer on the road,; he also confessed the Lord when he said "what shall I do, Lord".; He showed repentance as he prayed and fasted for three days, then he was told to get up and be baptized and wash away his sins.
All a person needs to is ask the question, What must I do, Lord"; and then look at all of the cases of conversion in the book of Acts.; They will take you from where you are the rest of the way.; If you are not a believer then the obvious first step will be "to belive" belive in what? That Christ is the Son of God and He Died for us, was buried and was raised the third day.
We must turn from our past life style (repentance). We must also confess Him as The Christ and confess our faith in Him. Then in every case in the examples the subject was baptized for the remission of sins.;; The gospel of Christ was a mystery but it has been reveled and it is so simple. After we have completed the acts of obedience we then have to walk in that newness of life, we are no longer of this world.
In acts 2 the Jews from many nations were there to attend the holy days of the Jewish system,; and Peter stood up with the eleven and preached to them and when they were touched in their hearts they asked what they should do. they were told to repent and be baptized (they were already believers).
They were, and the Lord added them to His church.; That is the only way we can become a member of Christ church is for Him to add us to it.;; No one can be voted in to Christ church or any other way.
Eph. 2:5 says we are saved by grace, nothing we can do will save us.; There are no works that can do will save us..; we can not earn salvation. It is a free gift of God, through His Son Jesus.
Baptism is not a work as some would say is it a command.
The mystery; that was hid in the Old testament was that Christ would bring all things together in Christ both Jew and Gentile and make one body.; It was a mystery because the Jews did not understand what God's plan was. Christ was offered one time for all time and for all people who would obey Him; See Gal 4:4 ff.; This was for the Jew first, on the day of Pentecost Acts 2.; and also the Gentile, Acts 10.; The Jews have to do the same thing as all other people do to be saved.; They will not be ruled over by Christ here on earth.; Christ said His kingdom was not of this earth.; His kingdom was and is a spiritual one where he reigns now.
When He comes again it will be to receive His children that where He is, there we will be also.
You asked what I thought and I have tried to put it in words and in Christian Love....
Don and Dannie
May God be with You
Dear Don and Dannie,
God Bless you, and thank you for writing. We can see you have put careful thought and study into this question. The question of baptism has long troubled Christianity in that there are many differing opinions on what the Bible teaches on this important subject. We as students of the Rightly Divided Word of Truth must not be swayed by the traditions and teachings of men but always look to the Scripture as our rule book of faith and practice.
Among the words written near the time of the beginning of Christianity, the new Hebrew believers were exhorted "to leave" not "lay again," laws and ordinances including "the doctrine of baptisms" Heb. 6:2, these being among the elements that were to be left behind as the believer pressed on unto perfection
The N.T. teaching concerning baptism is distributed thus:
1. John the Baptist. This baptism falls under two headings:
(a) It was a baptism unto repentance, in view of the near approach of the kingdom of heaven
Matt. 3:1-2
(b) It was the work of John as the forerunner prophesied of by Isaiah in the fortieth chapter of his prophecy.
(c) It was concerned only with Israel or with those who joined themselves to Israel, as the words "Comfort ye" of Isaiah 40 were concerned.
(d) It was a baptism in water that spoke of a future baptism with The Holy Ghost and with fire.
(e) It was specifically designed to make manifest to Israel the One Who was sent to be their Messiah John 1:30-34
2. The baptism with the Holy Ghost promised by John was fulfilled in Pentecost Acts 1:5.
3. During the Acts, water baptism and the baptism of the Spirit went together Acts 2:38, 10:47
4. During the first ministry of the Apostle Paul, baptism by water was practiced, 1 Cor. 1:16, but baptism never held the place in Paul's commission 1 Cor. 1:17 that it did in that of Peter's (Acts 2:38). Peter could never have said: "Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach The Gospel" as Paul did.
Baptism during the early ministry of Paul:
(a) united the believer by burial with the death of Christ Rom. 7:6-4
(b) united Jew and Gentile, making them "all one in Christ and Abraham's seed" Gal. 4:27-29.
(c) baptizing these believers into one body, with particular reference to the exercise of spiritual gifts 1 Cor. 12:13
5. After Acts 28 and the revelation of The Mystery, we enter into a calling where shadows give place to the reality of the Fulness of Christ Col. 2:17.
Baptism in the Epistles of The Mystery is either that which unites the believer with the death and Resurrection of Christ, Col. 2:12, or by which the believer becomes a member of The Church, which is His Body - Eph. 4:5.
Owing to the failure on the part of expositors and teachers to discern the change of dispensation consequent upon the setting aside of Israel at the time of Acts 28, there has been a failure to discern the extreme difference that exists between baptism as taught in the earliest part of the N.T. or even in the earlier epistles of Paul and as it is taught in the Epistles of The Mystery.
Galatians 3:19 asks a question: "Wherefore then serveth the law?" and the answer is: "It was superadded" (prostithemi). The Galatians were turning back to the weak and beggarly elements of the ceremonial law. "Now, this law was not promulgated in the first instance to the Jewish people, but was a superaddition to the antecedent moral law is a matter of universal notoriety. It is well-known (says Whitby) that all these ancient fathers were of the opinion that God gave the Jews only the Decalogue, till they made the golden calf, and afterward He laid the yoke of ceremonies upon them." "The law was superadded in behalf of transgressions being ordained in the hand of a mediator."
The Christian Church has fixed its attention so much upon these superadded carnal ordinances and has modeled its doctrine of baptism so much upon these things which were imposed until the time of reformation that they have given little or no place to The One Great Baptism, which was not added because of transgressions but was an integral part of the Redemption of the nation, namely The Baptism of the whole nation unto Moses at the Red Sea. That is the type that remains for us today; all others are carnal ordinances that have no place in the present economy of pure grace.
The Baptism of Colossians 2 is not likened to anything that was introduced into the Aaronic priesthood or Tabernacle service. It is likened to the initiatory rite of circumcision. Now, in Colossians 2, this circumcision is the spiritual equivalent of that practiced by the Jew; it is explicitly said to be "the circumcision made without hands" and repudiates "the body of the flesh" (sin is not in question; the revised text omits the words "of the sins"), and this is accomplished "by the circumcision of Christ." Now, until it can be proved that the circumcision here emphasized is the literal carnal ordinance, the consequential burial by baptism will have to be understood of the spiritual equivalent too and find its type, not in the many baptisms of the ceremonial law, but in The One Baptism of the whole nation at the crossing of the Red Sea. This "One Baptism" forms an integral part of the Unity of The Spirit, which those blessed under the terms of The Mystery are enjoined to keep. The seven parts of this unity are so disposed as to throw into correspondence the One Baptism in The One Spirit, thus:
One Hope, One Faith
One Spirit, One Baptism
One Body, One God, and Father
This sevenfold unity is composed of seven units - and to tamper with the repeated word "one" is to deny inspiration and to destroy the Apostle's insistence. We can no longer believe that "One" Baptism means two, i.e., "water and spirit," then we can import plurality into faith, hope, or the Lordship of Christ. It is the custom of those companies of Christians who stress baptism in water to call themselves "baptized believers." It is also, unfortunately, the habit of many who see the spiritual nature of Baptism in Colossians and Ephesians to allow this claim, but such are wrong. Members of The One Body are "baptized believers," for without this One Baptism, membership of The One Body is impossible. To speak otherwise is to magnify the carnal ordinance that pertains to the ceremonial act above the spiritual reality. The truth is that no company in the N.T. has ever known what True Baptism really is, except The Church, where baptism in water is absent and unknown.
Note the beautiful typology in 1 Peter 3:18-22:
1. The Ark It is clearly implied that the Ark represents a relationship with Christ. Noah and seven other persons were "in" the Ark, high and dry, so to speak, throughout the catastrophe. They were saved through the flood waters of judgment in the baptism of the Ark These verses do not teach baptismal regeneration, but rather ceremonial water baptism. Ceremonial baptism was the shadow; real baptism, the substance, is a relationship "in" Christ. In 1 Peter 3:21, the putting away of the filth of the flesh refers to ceremonial water baptism, which Peter contrasts with real baptism, the answer of a good conscience toward God. See also Romans 6.
2. The Flood Waters. As touched upon above, these represent judgment. The flood was necessary to destroy humanity corrupted by intermarriage with fallen angelic beings, the spirits in prison mentioned in 1 Peter 3:19-20. So, as some teach, it can not refer to human souls in some place of conscious torment like purgatory or hell. For further study, see Appendices 23 through 25 of the Companion Bible.
The Flood Waters can be applied typically to The Judgment, which took place at Calvary. Christ at Calvary was baptized into the wrath of God. All the waves and billows of that wrath passed over Him. Psalms 42:7 and Jonah 2:3. The believer does not fear the wrath of God which is to come. He is "in" Christ, the Ark.
The death, baptism, and Resurrection of Christ save him.
3. The Eight Souls. This was the number of persons in the Ark, and it is significant. Such numbers as 6, the number of man, and 7, the number of perfection, are examples known to most Bible students. The number 8 is the number of resurrection, The Resurrection of Christ in which all believers will share. It is The Hope of the believer, and it will make fully known and manifest The Truth of God as it is in Christ.
The unbelieving naturally cling to the ceremonial baptism. It ministers to the flesh. But no one shall experience resurrection and see God without the experience of the real baptism in this life.
Which baptism is for you?
The One Baptism we, as believers in this Dispensation of the Mystery, have is our spiritual identification with our Lord Christ Jesus. We are complete in Him (Colossians 2:10). The word complete in Greek means fulfill or filled to the full. We have Christ's death, burial, and Resurrection as ours and being raised with Him and seated with Him in the Far above heavens (Ephesians 2:6), where no sin or sinner has ever been or will be. We also found that our citizenship papers are from this same place (Philippians 3:20). Furthermore, since we have been raised with Him by the operation of God (Colossians 2:12), death and sin need no longer have dominion over us. We are to walk worthy of our calling, putting on the new man which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness (Ephesians 4:24). We have obtained all of this by faith and not of ourselves.
Paul writes and warns the Colossians in Col. 2:2 that it is only through the "...acknowledgment of The Mystery of God and of The Father, and of Christ, in Whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge", that they could find the wherewithal to walk in this world--not through the traditions, philosophies or the vain deceits of man. Behind all these entrapments is religion, the mother of which is Babylon. No matter what form religion may take, idolatry is the foundation of its worship. The flesh is easily deceived into believing that the observation of rituals, holy days, doctrines, abstinences, and commandments of men will gain for the flesh, and hence the person a closer walk with God. This was the point of the attack experienced by the believers at Colossae from the Gnostics and Judaizers.
Paul emphasizes to the believers that their completeness in Christ alone is sufficient. Religion would entrap the believer into holding onto something other than The Headship of Christ, which in this Dispensation of The Mystery provides our total life source.
Today, the members of The Church of The One Body are also subject to these attacks by spiritual wickedness, as were the Colossians. Our only source for wisdom, knowledge, and power comes from Christ, Who is our Life (Colossians 3:4), not from anything (including religion) of or in the world. We can know Him by His Word. We can receive further wisdom and revelation about Him in His Word and discover how completely we are identified with Him and how, by The One Baptism, His finished perfect work was graciously implanted in us. Search The Scriptures and see this identification for yourself.
The history books reveal that the question of baptism has been the cause of much bitterness, strife, and division. The basis for these disputes has risen out of the failure to discern the dispensational differences that distinguish the ministries of the N.T. These can be divided into three periods. Beginning with John the Baptist, it was water only with the promise of Spirit baptism. Secondly, during the Acts period, it was both water and Spirit. The third period, the period that we live in today, followed Acts 28:28. The Pentecostal dispensation, which began at the time of Acts chapter 2, ended because of Israel's unbelief. The only baptism that God honors for today is Spirit baptism.
Not long ago, we heard a preacher give a commentary on Ephesians 4:4-6 where we find the seven unities to be kept by The Church. He had no problem giving spiritual content to six of them, but the "One Baptism" proved a problem, needless to say. One Baptism means one, not two. What is it, water or spirit? It can't be both! The preacher saw the problem. He "solved" it by consulting at least 15 commentaries. All of them said it was water baptism! Consequently, each of us is faced with the responsibility of this decision: what will we believe, the Word of God or the commentaries?
The Unities of Ephesians 4:4-6 are not to be made, but to be kept! They contain the only formula available to prevent divisions. If the churches kept these Unities, they would not be so powerless and would not be the object of scorn and derision.
In 1 Corinthians 1:17, the Apostle Paul seems to have made a positive statement, For Christ sent me not to baptize, But to preach The Gospel." Yet Paul had listed the names of three individuals he had already baptized. He also included the household of one of the people he had baptized, so we don't know exactly how many Paul had baptized.
In the account of Paul, Silas, and Timothy preaching in the house of Justus in Corinth (Acts 18:7-8), we are told that many of the Corinthians heard, believed, and were baptized. At that time, Paul had undoubtedly baptized those he named in the first Corinthian letter.
However, we are left with the question, "If Christ had sent Paul not to baptize, why had he baptized any of them?" In order to answer this question and resolve the problem created, we must get a better understanding of the place of baptism. When John the Baptist began his ministry to Israel, he preached baptism for the repentance of sins.
Peter at Pentecost followed the same preaching as had John the Baptist, when Peter answered those who asked him, "Men and brethren, what shall we do?" (Acts 2:37) Peter's reply was, repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit." (Acts 2:38). Notice that Peter said that remission of sins was through Jesus Christ and the result of their baptism unto Him. Peter did not tell them, "Christ died for our sins," as Paul did in 1 Corinthians 15:3.
If we look at the context of The Scripture quoted first, 1 Corinthians 1:17, we see that Paul contrasts baptism with the preaching of the cross. This is the answer to Paul's statement, "Christ sent me not to baptize...lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect." (made void).
Paul was sent to preach the cross, the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins, not the baptism as John the Baptist and Peter had preached. Paul states, "Christ sent me not to baptize for the remission of sins, but to preach the cross for the remission of sins." Paul had been given a further understanding of the place of baptism in the purpose of God.
Baptism was to be for the identification of the believer with the death, burial, and Resurrection of The Lord Jesus Christ (Romans 6:3-4). Therefore, Paul was not hypocritical in saying one thing and seemingly doing another. By baptism, he was identifying those believers with the death, burial, and Resurrection of The Lord Jesus Christ.
While much more could be said, we are necessarily limited, but we believe every essential feature has been considered so that you can pursue the matter in detail with every hope of attaining unto fuller light.
All God's Blessings,
The Believers